挑战学术权威
Challenging academic authority
在“纳米AI”搜索中，输入“历史上，挑战学术权威成功的案例”，很快就会弹出：“哥白尼的日心说，挑战了托勒密的地心说。提出以太阳为中心的宇宙模型，为现代天文学奠定了基础”。
When searching for 'nano AI' and typing 'historical cases of challenging academic authority,' the result immediately shows: 'Copernicus's heliocentric theory challenged Ptolemy's geocentric model. His proposal of a solar-centered universe laid the foundation for modern astronomy.'
确实是这样，哥白尼的“日心说”，对后来人们了解宇宙中的自然现象，起到至关重要的作用。比如伽利略斜塔实验，利用自制望远镜发现了木星的卫星，以及牛顿发现了“地心引力”等等。
Indeed, Copernicus 'heliocentric theory played a pivotal role in later human understanding of natural phenomena in the universe. For instance, Galileo's Leaning Tower experiment, where he used a homemade telescope to discover Jupiter's moons, and Newton's discovery of 'gravity,' among others.
当时，由于西方人没有一个整体的宇宙观，也就在地球不是宇宙的中心，太阳也不是宇宙的中心，银河系的“银心”，还不是宇宙的中心的问题上，西方科学家在研究宇宙时就非常困惑了，宇宙到底有没有中心？中心在哪？问题是这个宇宙世界，到底又是从何而来的？对于这些天大的问题，谁也无法能回答得清楚，也就导致了上个世纪初，瑞典牧师勒梅特，他假设整个宇宙，是由一粒非常微小的粒子（后来被霍金描述成一个“奇点”），在没有任何征兆下，猛然发生了大爆炸、大膨胀，才创生出今天约138.2亿光年的宇宙空间，以此来安慰人们好奇的心灵。
At that time, Western scientists were perplexed by the lack of a unified cosmological view, particularly regarding the Earth's non-central position in the universe, the Sun's non-central status, and the Milky Way's "galactic center" not being the universe's core. They grappled with fundamental questions: Does the universe have a center? If so, where is it? And more crucially, where did this cosmic universe originate? These profound mysteries remained unanswered until the early 20th century, when Swedish theologian Lemaitre proposed a groundbreaking theory. He suggested the universe began with a single, microscopic particle (later termed a "singularity" by Hawking) that exploded and expanded without warning, creating the current 13.82-billion-light-year universe—a startling revelation that ultimately satisfied humanity's insatiable curiosity.
牧师勒梅特假设的宇宙创生论，完全符合“唯心论”的神话传说，就被科学家誉为“经典宇宙模型”。这跟五百多年前，罗马神学家把托勒密的“地心说”，编写进“圣经”的经书里面，有相似之处。
The cosmogony of Le Maire, which is in full accord with the myth of "idealism", is praised by scientists as "the classical cosmological model".
这种虚拟“宇宙模型”的理论，被科技工作者写进了教科书，还在世界上到处散播。我国的科学理论者，不但没有产生怀疑，而是像捡到宝贝那样，在全国各地到处宣扬，又把它当成教材，而且在大学、中学的讲台上演讲，在电视台上播放，报刊杂志也经常报道，硬是把虚拟假设说成是真相。
This theoretical framework of the virtual "cosmic model" has been incorporated into textbooks by scientific researchers and disseminated globally. Chinese scholars, instead of questioning it, have embraced it as a treasure, promoting it nationwide as teaching material. They lecture on university and high school campuses, air it on television, and regularly feature it in newspapers and magazines, effectively turning a hypothetical theory into an accepted truth.
事实上，这将会是怎样呢？在2023年出版了一本书，书名叫做《东方宇宙观》，在书的文章中，提出四大发现：第一大发现，主要是讲在宇宙中，只有一空一物。一空，指我们眼前这个空间大到无限大。一物，指我们眼前所有大大小小的物质体，其中的物质粒子小到无限小；而物质天体，却是大到无限大。
What does this actually mean? In 2023, a book titled *The Eastern Cosmology* was published, presenting four groundbreaking discoveries. The first reveals that the universe contains only two fundamental elements: space and matter. Space refers to the infinite expanse before our eyes, while matter encompasses all physical entities—both microscopic particles and colossal celestial bodies—each infinitely vast in scale.
这个无限大的物质空间天体，就是由无限多又无限小的粒子，逐个层次组合到无限大的。这就是说：无限多又无限小的粒子，通过层次组合成无限多的原子；无限多的原子，继续组合成为无限多的恒星系（太阳系）；无限多的恒星系，又继续组合成为无限多的河外星系（银河系）；无限多的河外星系，同样会继续组合成为无限大的物质空间天体。
This infinite material space celestial body is formed through hierarchical combinations of infinitely numerous yet infinitesimally small particles. Specifically: infinitely numerous particles combine hierarchically into infinitely many atoms; these atoms further assemble into countless star systems (solar systems); these star systems then merge into infinite extragalactic systems (the Milky Way); and these extragalactic systems ultimately coalesce into the boundless material space celestial body.
这段理论，就是本书的中心内容，完全符合了恩格斯的“空间无限性”理论，也符合了两千多年前，我国古代“诸子百家”中的庄子，在他的《天下篇》中，记述他的好友惠施的一段话：“一尺之棰，日取其半，万世不竭”的哲学名言。这样，也就完全否定掉勒梅特的“宇宙大爆炸”，创生整个宇宙的学说。宇宙就是由“无限多又无限小的粒子，通过层次组合而来”的理论，这又奠定了宇宙观的新学说。
This theory, the central focus of the book, fully aligns with Engels '"spatial infinity" theory and echoes the ancient Chinese philosophical maxim recorded by Zhuangzi in his *Tianxia* chapter from the *Hundred Schools of Thought* over two millennia ago: "A one-foot club, halved daily, would never run out." Thus, it completely refutes Le Métrée's "Big Bang" theory of cosmic creation. The theory posits that the universe originates from "countless infinitely small particles arranged in hierarchical layers," establishing a new cosmological framework.
在书中有第二大发现，就是一篇叫做《探索地球引力的物理成因》的文章，推理出牛顿的“万有引力”的引力现象，就是出自于众多物质粒子，一起做群体性高速绕心运动时，所产生的“真空能”引力效应。这个发现，直接推翻了爱因斯坦，假设的“时空弯曲”所产生引力的科幻故事。
The book's second major discovery is an article titled "Exploring the Physical Causes of Earth's Gravity," which deduces that Newton's "law of universal gravitation" originates from the gravitational effect of "vacuum energy" generated when numerous particles collectively orbit the center at high speed. This finding directly refutes Einstein's hypothetical science fiction story about gravity produced by "space-time curvature."
在书中提出的第三大发现，就是一篇题名为《河外星系》的文章。在文章中指出：天文学家利用天文望远镜，所看到的“河外星系”中心的黑点，是类似于台风的风眼，还能根据“河外星系”中心黑点的明暗，来断定其中心旋转速度呢。理论依据是，台风是由水分子和空气中的氮氧原子，以及二氧化碳分子组成的；而河外星系，却是由太阳系同类型的恒星系所构成的。恒星跟原子之比，虽然在体积上，存在着大小特别悬殊的比例外，但大与小全部都是物质体。对此，这种理论就直接否定掉了近代科学家，所提出的“黑洞”，能吞噬掉空间、时间和光线等“奇谈怪论”。大家想一想，世界上哪有什么东西，才会吃掉空间和时间呢？空间和时间真的那么好吃吗？真是奇怪了！智商160的大名鼎鼎科学家们，也会创作出这种低级趣味的“科幻故事”，来蒙骗三岁小孩呢。
The third major discovery presented in the book is an article titled "Extragalactic Systems". The article states that astronomers using telescopes have observed a black spot at the center of "extragalactic systems", which resembles the eye of a typhoon. They can even determine the rotational speed of these systems based on the brightness of the central black spot. The theoretical basis is that typhoons consist of water molecules, nitrogen and oxygen atoms in the air, and carbon dioxide molecules, while extragalactic systems are composed of star systems similar to those in our solar system. Although the ratio of stars to atoms shows a particularly large disparity in size, both are essentially material entities. This theory directly negates the "black hole" concept proposed by modern scientists, which claims they can devour space, time, and light – a "strange tale". Think about it: What in the world could possibly eat up space and time? Are space and time really that tasty? How bizarre! Even renowned scientists with IQs of 160 create such lowbrow "science fiction stories" to deceive three-year-old children.
书中的第四大发现，就是在一篇叫做《基因》的文章中，指出地球上所有生物的生命基因，都是从原子质体内的粒子活性基因遗传而来的，并不是神学家虚构的“上帝”所创造的。
The fourth major discovery in the book is that, in an article titled "Genes," it points out that all life genes on Earth are inherited from the active genes within atomic particles, not created by the "God" fabricated by theologians.
就这四大发现，是科学家万万没有想到的，也就是在短时间内，科学家是很难接受的。并且提出这“四大发现”的人，并不是真正的科学家，而是一个普普通通的农民。所以，这就很像四十年前，有一位叫做陆家羲的数学家那样，差一点就会被人们所遗忘掉了，幸亏加拿大一位数学家门德尔逊来华讲学，才发现了陆家羲。
These four groundbreaking discoveries were utterly unexpected by scientists, making them hard to accept in such a short time. What's more, the person who proposed these "four major discoveries" was not a true scientist but an ordinary farmer. This situation is reminiscent of the case of mathematician Lu Jiaxi forty years ago, who nearly faded into obscurity. Fortunately, Canadian mathematician Mendelson came to China to lecture, which led to Lu Jiaxi's rediscovery.
那么，为什么我们中国在近代史上，主要的科学理论，却远远落后于西方呢？对于这个问题，就应该跟明朝和清朝的封建社会制度有关。就像五千多年前，我们的老祖先夸父，他早就知道地球是圆的，就想跟着太阳往西面走，认为最终会像太阳和月亮那样，能从东面返回来。不管“夸父逐日”成功与否，他勇敢去探索自然现象的伟大精神，本来就要受到子孙后代的传承和尊重。可是，却被嘲笑成“不自量力”，这是多么悲哀的事情啊！在书中就有一篇文章叫做《夸父》，就是为“夸父”鸣个不平的。“夸父”的伟大壮举，比西方的麦哲伦环球探险，就早了几千年，这是无法否定掉的历史事实！
So, why did China lag far behind the West in major scientific theories during modern history? This question is closely related to the feudal social systems of the Ming and Qing dynasties. Just like over five thousand years ago, our ancestor Kuafu already knew the Earth was round and wanted to follow the sun westward, believing he would eventually return from the east like the sun and the moon. Regardless of whether "Kuafu Chasing the Sun" succeeded or not, his great spirit of bravely exploring natural phenomena was meant to be inherited and respected by future generations. Yet, he was mocked as "overestimating his abilities" —what a tragic thing! There is an article in the book titled "Kuafu," which speaks up for "Kuafu." The great feat of "Kuafu" predates Magellan's circumnavigation of the globe by thousands of years, an undeniable historical fact!
西方人与我们东方人就大不一样，他们只要有一项发现，或者发明创造，都会“大张旗鼓”地向全世界宣布，并“群起而吹捧之”，以标志着西方文明的进步。就亚里士多德来说，历史上还不知道有没有其人，就被吹成具有“三头六臂”的活神仙。要是没有西方人那么会吹，我们是不知道托勒密的“地心说”；哥白尼的“日心说”，牛顿的“万有引力”；还有勒梅特的“宇宙大爆炸”；爱因斯坦的“弯曲时空”；米歇尔的“黑洞”；霍金的“奇点”等等。
Westerners and Easterners are fundamentally different. Whenever they make a discovery or invention, they proudly proclaim it to the world and lavishly praise it, as if to celebrate the progress of Western civilization. Take Aristotle, for instance—historical records may not even confirm his existence, yet he was glorified as a "three-headed, six-armed" living deity. Without such Western hype, we would never have known of Ptolemy's geocentric theory, Copernicus' heliocentric model, Newton's law of universal gravitation, Le Métrée's Big Bang theory, Einstein's curved spacetime, Michel's black hole concept, or Hawking's singularity theory.
《东方宇宙观》这本书的文章内容，写的就是自然哲学，也就是“空对空”讲道理，看谁讲得有道理，谁才算是真理！犹如《矛盾论》。
The book "Oriental Cosmology" explores natural philosophy through its "empty-to-empty" reasoning, where the truth is determined by who presents the most compelling arguments—much like the "On Contradiction".
现在，欠缺就是能跟学术权威的专家、教授们面对面讲道理，有哪一位专家，愿意前来讲道理吗？
Nowadays, what we lack is the opportunity to engage in face-to-face discussions with authoritative scholars and professors. Who among them would be willing to come forward and share their insights?
西方人提出“宇宙大爆炸”、“黑洞”、“时空弯曲”和“奇点”的科学大师们，都已经作古了。现在具备科学权威的人，都是那些天天在讲台上，给大中专学生讲“宇宙大爆炸”的教授们，还有在网络上，电视台上，报刊杂志上，天天搞演讲的专家们（院士）。看看有哪一位专家，能发现另一种自然现象（有别于“宇宙大爆炸”整套虚拟理论）作为依据，来辩驳掉这本书中“四大发现”的理论。到时，人类文明又能更上一层楼！（作者：吕金来2025.11.09）
The scientific luminaries who proposed the "Big Bang Theory," "black holes," "space-time curvature," and "singularities" have all passed away. Today's scientific authorities are professors lecturing college students daily on the "Big Bang Theory," along with experts (academicians) who give speeches incessantly on the internet, TV, and in newspapers and magazines. Can any of these experts identify another natural phenomenon—distinct from the entire fabricated "Big Bang Theory" —to refute the "Four Great Discoveries" theory in this book? If they could, human civilization would truly reach new heights! (Author: Lü Jinlai, November 9, 2025)
（《东方宇宙观》这本书，可以在电子书：微信读书、掌阅、亚马逊等上查看，阅读）
The book "Eastern Cosmology" is available for reading on e-book platforms including WeChat Reading, iReader, and Amazon.
